People search
(married name will be ignored if broad check is ticked;
a broad check includes a search for nicknames, married names and other alternative names)Where were they from?
Search for places, see all people in the tree with events in that place, and (where added) see places marked on a map with photos, links and other information about the location.
Lily Maud FARQUHAR
1902 - Yes, date unknown
Has 6 ancestors but no descendants in this family tree.
Set As Default Person 
-
Name Lily Maud FARQUHAR Relationship 
with Teresa Ann GOATHAM Born Sep Q 1902 John Street, Rochester, Kent, England 
- From the 1911 census where shown as aged 8
GRO ref: Farquhar, Lily Maud q3 1902 Medway RD 2a 714; GRO online index shows mother's maiden name as Woolley
Gender Female Died Yes, date unknown Siblings2 brothers and 2 sisters Patriarch & Matriarch 
Robert FARQUHAR, b. 14 Apr 1872, Old Ford Road, London, England, d. Jun Q 1946, Woolwich Reg Dist, Kent or London, England (Age 73 years) (Father) 
Adelaide, d. Yes, date unknown (Grandmother)Person ID I19737 All | England: Kent Group (in Go(a)tham One-Name Study), All in the Goatham / Gotham One-Name Study Last Modified 16 Oct 2017
Father Robert FARQUHAR, b. 14 Apr 1872, Old Ford Road, London, England , d. Jun Q 1946, Woolwich Reg Dist, Kent or London, England (Age 73 years) Mother Lily WOOLLEY, b. 10 Feb 1878, Milton next Sittingbourne, Kent, England , d. Jun Q 1969, Greenwich Reg Dist, Kent, England (Age 90 years) Married 17 May 1898 Holy Trinity Church, Maidstone, Kent, England - GRO ref: Farquhar, Robert to Woolley, Lily q2 1898 Maidstone RD 2a 1544
Details from PR (image on FMP, viewed 23 Sep 2020)Strangely, the 1911 census shows that Robert and Lily had had two children by then, although they had two with them and Lily had another with her in 1901.
The latter, a son Albert, was born the quarter after the wedding - was he the son of Lily but not Robert, or was '2' simply an error?
The family were in Gillingham in 1911, but as I can't find them in Kent in 1939 or Robert and Lily's death prior to that I thought they might be the Robert and Lily who died in Woolwich / Greenwich.
Seeing the 1939 registration image together with looking for more children seems to confirm that this is the couple who subsequently lived in Woolwich, despite a couple of date differences in the 1939 register or the index. It is clear the Robert E shown as born 1874 was actually born 1914, and Lily's year is clearly wrong in the register - the date and month match the dob in the death registration index exactly, though the year doesn't.
Family ID F279 Family Group Page | Family Chart
- From the 1911 census where shown as aged 8