People search
(married name will be ignored if broad check is ticked;
a broad check includes a search for nicknames, married names and other alternative names)Where were they from?
Search for places, see all people in the tree with events in that place, and (where added) see places marked on a map with photos, links and other information about the location.
John EASTLEY
Est 1586 - Yes, date unknown
Has no ancestors but 3 descendants in this family tree.
Set As Default Person 
-
Name John EASTLEY Relationship 
with Teresa Ann GOATHAM Born Est 1586 - Estimate based on date of his marriage, assuming it was his first. I think it likely that John was descended from the Ipplepen family, perhaps most likely a son of this John.
His first son was named John, possibly after himself but quite likely after his father - hence me preferring John as his father to Richard (however, at this time godparents names may still have been more important than parents names in naming children, though wills show that when they were still living grandparents were often chosen as godparents, so their names still got passed on).
Also, the John, the 'patriarch' of the Stokenham Issells named his first known son Richard; was he this Richard's son? Whilst it was far from unknown at this period for two children to be given the same name in the majority of families this did not happen (unless one had died), so this John and John of Stokenham probably had different fathers.
Gender Male Died Yes, date unknown Person ID I30068 All Last Modified 15 Aug 2020
Family Honour HUNT, d. Yes, date unknown Married 26 Jan 1614/15 St. Mary’s Church, Abbotskerswell, Devon, England 
- From PR entry (image on Devon FHS website, members' section)
"John Eastley of this p[ar]ish; and Honour Hunt serva[n]t unto Richard Popp of this p[ar]osj were maried the xxvith day of January" - under heading 'Mariages in January 1614'
Children3 children Last Modified 8 Jan 2020 Family ID F11569 Family Group Page | Family Chart
- Estimate based on date of his marriage, assuming it was his first. I think it likely that John was descended from the Ipplepen family, perhaps most likely a son of this John.