People search
(married name will be ignored if broad check is ticked;
a broad check includes a search for nicknames, married names and other alternative names)Where were they from?
Search for places, see all people in the tree with events in that place, and (where added) see places marked on a map with photos, links and other information about the location.
Susanna WILDBORE
1587 -
Has 5 ancestors but no descendants in this family tree.
Set As Default Person 
-
Name Susanna WILDBORE Relationship 
with Teresa Ann GOATHAM Baptised 11 Jul 1587 St. Mary the Virgin Church, Minster in Thanet, Kent, England 
- From FamilySearch, transcribed data citing ATs (not found in PRs)
Shows Susan Wildbore, daughter of Georg
(image viewable at FHCs - on my 'to do' list for a future visit)
Gender Female Died - Not mentioned in her father's will, possibly died before 1606/7
Siblings4 brothers and 2 sisters Half-siblings2 half brothers and 1 half sister (family of George WILDBORE and Alice ) Half-siblings1 half brother and 2 half sisters (family of Gilbert PAMPHLETT and Alice SACKETT) Patriarch & Matriarch 
WILDBORE, d. Yes, date unknown (Great Grandfather)
Alice SACKETT, b. Est 1542, bur. 3 Aug 1616, St. Mary the Virgin Church, Minster in Thanet, Kent, England (Age ~ 74 years) (Mother) Person ID I29669 All Last Modified 17 Dec 2019
Father George WILDBORE, b. Est 1534, d. Between 23 Feb 1606/07 and 26 Feb 1606/07 (Age ~ 73 years)
Other Partners: Alice m. Bef 1562Mother Alice SACKETT, b. Est 1542, bur. 3 Aug 1616, St. Mary the Virgin Church, Minster in Thanet, Kent, England (Age ~ 74 years)
Other Partners: Gilbert PAMPHLETT m. 19 Jan 1562/63Married 9 Jul 1571 St. Mary the Virgin Church, Minster in Thanet, Kent, England - From PR entry (image on FMP, viewed 4 Nov 2019)
"julii 9. nupti erant Georgius wildbore et alicia pamplet vidua."
(When George married Alice she was shown as a widow, he was not recorded as a widower. However, looking at several pages of marriages in Minster around this time there were quite a number of brides recorded as widow, not one groom shown as widower. I think it inconceivable there were no widowers remarrying in the period checked; it seems the grooms marital status was not considered worth recording).
Family ID F11420 Family Group Page | Family Chart
- From FamilySearch, transcribed data citing ATs (not found in PRs)