People search
(married name will be ignored if broad check is ticked;
a broad check includes a search for nicknames, married names and other alternative names)Where were they from?
Search for places, see all people in the tree with events in that place, and (where added) see places marked on a map with photos, links and other information about the location.
Rose Ellen WRIGHT
1866 - 1911 (~ 49 years)
Has no ancestors and no descendants in this family tree.
Set As Default Person 
-
Name Rose Ellen WRIGHT Relationship 
with Teresa Ann GOATHAM Born Between 1862 and 1866 Brandon, Suffolk, England 
- From the age given in marriage entry and 1901 and 1911 censuses, and birthplace in the latter (just Norfolk in 1911)
Gender Female Died Jun Q 1911 St. Pancras Reg Dist, London, England - GRO ref: Beetch, Rose E q2 1911 aged 48 Pancras RD 1b 10
Person ID I23754 All | England: Kent Group (in Go(a)tham One-Name Study), All in the Goatham / Gotham One-Name Study Last Modified 8 Feb 2018
Family Alfred Thomas BEETCH, b. 7 Dec 1864, St. Luke’s Parish, London, Middlesex, England , d. Dec Q 1949, St. Pancras Reg Dist, London, England (Age 84 years)
Other Partners: Isabel GILLINGHAM m. Mar Q 1892; Annie m. Bef 1939Banns of marriage From 2 Apr 1899 to 16 Apr 1899 Christ Church, St. Pancras, London, England Married 18 Apr 1899 Christ Church, St. Pancras, London, England - From PR entry (image on Ancestry, viewed 27 Apr 2017)
Shows Alfred Thomas Beetch, aged 35, Widower, Labourer of 171 Albany St, father Thomas Beetch, a Builder married
Rose Ellen Sewell, aged 35, Widow, no occupation given, of 171 Albany St, father John Wright, a Painter
Married after Banns, by F. T. Hitling
Both signed, as did witnesses J Wilkinson and E Sewell
GRO ref: Beetch, Alfred Thomas to Sewell, Rose Ellen q2 1899 Pancras RD 1b 189
Had Rose, like Alfred's first wife seems to, altered her Christian names in some way? - I can't find a suitable birth of a Rose Ellen Wright or of a Sewell = Wright marriage. Rose could have been married more than once before, but this would not explain the absence of a birth registration.
The information about the length of the current marriage and no. of children had, not unusually, been wrongly filled in for Alfred rather than Rose in the 1911 census. Not so usual, it had been left there and not crossed out and inserted for Rose. The number of years of marriage completed is close to right - 10 rather than 11, but the no. of children seems to apply to Alfred's first marriage. It shows 4 children born to the marriage, 3 of whom were still living. This not only matches the first marriage, but if Alfred had had the same with Rose it is highly probably that the living children would have been with them at the time of the 1911 census, as not aged more than 12. However, the only children who were present were 2 from Alfred 's first marriage.
The lack of any figures for Rose and for any figures greater than the number Alfred had in his first marriage, and the lack of any Beetch with a mother's maiden name of Wright in the GRO online index suggests Alfred and Rose had no children together.
Family This couple had no children together Last Modified 8 Feb 2018 Family ID F9288 Family Group Page | Family Chart