Website in the process of being upgraded - full menu should be back on all pages soon.
Full menu can be viewed here.


Thomas BLUSH

Thomas BLUSH

Male - 1639    Has no ancestors but 2 descendants in this family tree.


 Set As Default Person    

Personal Information    |    Event Map    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Thomas BLUSH 
    Relationshipwith Teresa Ann GOATHAM
    Baptised
    • Probably the son of George, either baptised 7 Jun 1590 or 6 Feb 1585/86. (A Thomas son of Henrie baptised in 1595/96 died in infancy).
    Gender Male 
    Occupation 1630 
    Thatcher 
    • Described as such when granted administration of his step-sons goods
    Buried 22 Jan 1638/39  St. Michael and All Angels’ Church, Marden, Kent, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location 
    • From KFHS transcribed data (on CD 25,
      Shows Thomas BLUSH, bur 22 Jan 1638/9. Was it this Thomas? Seems likely, but with baptisms in 1585/6 and 1590 it could be the other of those.
    Notes 
    • A Thomas BLUSH was the reputed father of a Sara WELLS baptised in Marden on 26 Nov 1626, dau of Agnes WELLS. Possibly this Thomas, could be the other son of George.
    Person ID I19257  All
    Last Modified 23 Jan 2020 

    Family Marie,   b. Est 1580 
    Other Partners: Edward BURR 
    Married 5 Jun 1615  St. Michael and All Angels’ Church, Marden, Kent, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location 
    • From PR entry (image on FMP, viewed 23 Jan 2020)
      "June 1615 Thomas Blush & Mary Burr were maried the 5th day"
      There were marriages of Mary BURs in Marden in 1612 and 1615. The will of William BURR (died 1612) shows his daughter Mary to be the wife of John WALKER, and that his son Edward's widow was called Mary; hence I think this marriage probably this Mary's remarriage. The will of William ('middle'), son of the afore mentioned William describe's Mary Blush, wife of Thomas as his sister. However, the fact that Mary was shown as Mary Bur and not Mary Walker, together with William 'middle''s blood sister Mary appearing to have died in 1614 point to it being this Mary who married Thomas Blush, and suggest William 'middle' was referring to his sister-in-law as his sister (this was not unusual, though I'm not sure if it often found at the same time as others are described as 'in-law', as is the case here). Further evidence that it was this Marie who married Thomas is that in the inventory of her son William 'junior'. In that Thomas Blush is described as father-in-law (a term often used in the past for step-fathers).
    Children 2 children 
    Last Modified 23 Jan 2020 
    Family ID F7585  Family Group Page  |  Family Chart

  • Event Map Click to hide
     = Link to Google Earth (if installed; see link below to install) 
    Pin Legend Address Church or Cemetery Military service or death Hospital Small location Town / City County, state or province Country Registration District Place of education Court Property Not Set